The Canadian Court Rundown
Calum McCracken and Carter Bobbie

Summary: The Canadian Court Rundown explores how the courts can be used as a tool for citizens to seek policy and constitutional reform, as well as remedies. The hosts welcome Wolfville lawyer Derrick Kimball to the show as he describes his own experience of bringing a case to the Supreme Court of Canada and reflects on the balance between parliamentary and constitutional supremacy. 



Dauvergne, Catherine. "How the charter has failed non-citizens in canada: reviewing thirty years of supreme court of canada jurisprudence." Mcgill Law Journal 58, no. 3 (March 2013): 663-728. Business Source Premier, EBSCOhost

Hausegger, L., Riddell, T., & Hennigar, M. Canadian courts (1st ed.). London: Oxford University Press.

Fleming and Glen S. Kurtz. 2002a. “Repeat Litigators and Agenda Setting on the Supreme Court of Canada, “Canadian Journal of Political Science 35: 811-33

Heard, Andrew D. “The Charter in the Supreme Court of Canada: The Importance of Which Judges Hear an Appeal.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 24, no. 2 (1991): 289–307. doi:10.1017/S0008423900005096.

Hennigar, M. (2007). Why Does the Federal Government Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada in Charter of Rights Cases? A Strategic Explanation. Law & Society Review, 41(1), 225-250.

R v. Richard. 24528 [1996] 3 SCR 525. Supreme Court of Canada. 31 June 1996. N.p., n.d. Web.

Songer, D. (2008). The Transformation of the Supreme Court of Canada (1st ed.). Canada: University of Toronto Press

Supreme Court of Canada. 2003. Supreme Court of Canada: Statistics 2002 to 2012. At:

Yunusov, P. (2010). Are there inalienable rights in Canada?. Law is Cool. Retrieved 4 December 2017, from